Section 111(1)(d) of the ITO 2001, introduced in 2011, cannot be applied retrospectively to the Tax Year 2010 --- Lahore High Court, Lahore
The Official Forms used to record election results, such as Form-45 and Form-47, carry a Presumption of Correctness unless Evidence proves otherwise ---
Chancellor of University is the Final Authority in the Selection and Recruitment Process and Judicial Intervention in such Administrative Matters, should be ---
Subsidies were never Chargeable to Tax therefore Subsidies provided by Government to DISCOs are exempted from Sales Tax --- Lahore High Court, Lahore
The Political Parties must submit their Lists of Candidates for Reserved Seats within stipulated time before ECP; SIC failed to submit list, ---
The Chancellor (Governor Punjab) does not have the Authority to unilaterally prescribe criteria for Appointments of the Dean of University without Statutory ---
Substantive Changes in Law do not operate Retroactively unless expressly provided by the Statute --- Lahore High Court, Lahore
Any Penal Action, such as denying an Election Symbol, must be interpreted narrowly and cannot be extended to affect other rights not explicitly covered ---
Fraud vitiates all Transactions and no Plea of Finality or Past Closed Transactions could protect a Fraudulent Sale --- Lahore High Court
Once a Right Accrued in favor of a person, it cannot be taken away arbitrarily by an Executive Authority --- Lahore High Court, Lahore
Give Preference to the Children of Government Employees at the time of Appointment in Service undermines the Principle of Meritocracy which is essential ---
Expert Testimony is Weak Evidence and cannot Override the need for Direct Evidence --- Lahore High Court, Lahore